04-29-2024, 06:43 AM
Hi everyone,
I've been pondering the risk elements inherent in various sourcing strategies. How do sole sourcing and single sourcing compare when it comes to risk?
Understanding that a sole source supplier scenario implies exclusivity often due to unique product offerings, the risks seem to be magnified. If that supplier encounters problems, isn't a company then potentially facing a significant disruption without a fallback?
Conversely, single sourcing allows a company to maintain a chosen partner while still preserving the option to pivot to other suppliers if necessary. Does this mean single sourcing might be a safer bet in terms of risk management?
Would love to hear thoughts on this, especially any experiences on how companies mitigate risks in these two sourcing approaches. Thanks!
I've been pondering the risk elements inherent in various sourcing strategies. How do sole sourcing and single sourcing compare when it comes to risk?
Understanding that a sole source supplier scenario implies exclusivity often due to unique product offerings, the risks seem to be magnified. If that supplier encounters problems, isn't a company then potentially facing a significant disruption without a fallback?
Conversely, single sourcing allows a company to maintain a chosen partner while still preserving the option to pivot to other suppliers if necessary. Does this mean single sourcing might be a safer bet in terms of risk management?
Would love to hear thoughts on this, especially any experiences on how companies mitigate risks in these two sourcing approaches. Thanks!